Environment
Font Size  Make text larger   Make text smaller

Our environmental scorecard

Gas-fired power has unrivalled potential to help Australia meet its carbon pollution reduction targets. While renewable energies are currently not sustainable around-the-clock, gas offers an excellent bridging alternative to coal in the coming decade.

Gas produces about half of the greenhouse gas emissions of coal, and is available all day and night, like coal, to power our homes and businesses. The following table details the contribution each ERM generation project is making to reduce Australia's greenhouse emissions. It outlines the comparitive amount of CO2 produced by a gas-fired (versus coal-fired) power station, and the quantity of emissions saved over the life of the project.

The table below summarises the comparative environmental benefits associated with gas-fired generation assets developed by ERM Power since 1998. The comparison is with the average greenhouse gas intensity of the Australian electricity generation sector.

PROJECT Capacity (MW) Annual running duration Power produced (MWh/yr) Tonnes of CO2 produced Equivalent CO2 produced by coal tCO2
saved/
year
Operating life (years) Lifetime
CO2
Oakey 300 MW 10% 262,800 210,240 262,800 52,560 30 1,576,800
Braemar 1 450 MW 45% 1,773,900 1,153,035 1,773,900 620,865 30 18,625,950
Braemar 2 450 MW 45% 1,773,900 1,153,035 1,773,900 620,865 30 18,625,950
Kwinana 320 MW 95% 2,663,040 1,145,107 2,663,040 1,517,933 30

45,537,984

Uranquinty 640 MW 15% 840,960 546,624 840,960 294,336 30 8,830,080
Neerabup 330 MW 25% 722,700 469,755 7,227,000 252,945 30

8,830,080